C#例項化物件的三種方式及效能對比
阿新 • • 發佈:2020-12-10
前言
做專案過程中有個需求要例項化兩萬個物件並新增到List
首先想到的是可能例項化比較耗時,於是開始對每種例項化方式進行測試,過程如下
例項化方式
1、用 New 關鍵字例項化一個類
2、用 Activator 例項化一個類
3、用 Assembly 例項化一個類
程式碼實現
測試環境:
vs2019 .NET Framework 4.7
Intel Core i7-10510U CPU
首先定義一個類Person
public class Person { public Person() { } public Person(string name) { Name = name; } public string Name { get; set; } }
我們先在無參的建構函式中例項化,每種方式進行十次,每次例項化十萬次,程式碼如下
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("例項化物件的耗時比較(單位:毫秒)"); Console.Write(" "); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) Console.Write("{0:G}", i.ToString().PadLeft(5)); Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByNew".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) person = new Person(); watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByActivator".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Type type = Type.GetType("ConsoleApp1.Person"); Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) { object obj = Activator.CreateInstance(type); person = obj as Person; } watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByAssembly".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Assembly assembly = Assembly.Load("InstancePerformance"); Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) { object obj = assembly.CreateInstance("ConsoleApp1.Person"); person = obj as Person; } watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.ReadKey(); }
執行結果如下:
然後來看下有參建構函式中例項化的程式碼和結果
static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("例項化物件的耗時比較(單位:毫秒)"); Console.Write(" "); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) Console.Write("{0:G}", i.ToString().PadLeft(5)); Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByNew".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) person = new Person("Test"+j); watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByActivator".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Type type = Type.GetType("ConsoleApp1.Person"); Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) { object obj = Activator.CreateInstance(type,new object[]{"Test"+j}); person = obj as Person; } watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.Write("InstanceByAssembly".PadRight(20)); for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++) { Assembly assembly = Assembly.Load("InstancePerformance"); Person person = null; Stopwatch watch = new Stopwatch(); watch.Start(); for (int j = 0; j < 100000; j++) { object obj = assembly.CreateInstance("ConsoleApp1.Person", true, System.Reflection.BindingFlags.Default, null, new []{"Test"+j}, null, null); person = obj as Person; } watch.Stop(); Console.Write(watch.ElapsedMilliseconds.ToString().PadLeft(5)); } Console.Write("\n"); Console.ReadKey(); }
執行結果如下:
結論
從上面的執行結果可以看出這三種方式的效能排序為
New > Activator > Assembly
但使用哪種方法還要視情況而定