1. 程式人生 > >高效的SQLSERVER分頁方案

高效的SQLSERVER分頁方案

以及 時序 增加 運行 因此 enc 擴展 from 當前頁

Sqlserver數據庫分頁查詢一直是Sqlserver的短板,假設有表ARTICLE,字段ID、YEAR,數據53210條(客戶真實數據,量不大),分頁查詢每頁30條,查詢第1500頁(即第45001-45030條數據),字段ID聚集索引,YEAR無索引,Sqlserver版本:2008R2

第一種方案:
SELECT TOP 30 * FROM ARTICLE WHERE ID NOT IN(SELECT TOP 45000 ID FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) ORDER BY YEAR DESC,ID DESC

平均查詢100次所需時間:45s

第二種方案:

SELECT * FROM (  SELECT TOP 30 * FROM (SELECT TOP 45030 * FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) f ORDER BY f.YEAR ASC, f.ID DESC) s ORDER BY s.YEAR DESC,s.ID DESC

平均查詢100次所需時間:138S

第三種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1,
(
SELECT TOP 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT TOP 50030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC

) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC
) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

平均查詢100次所需時間:21S

第四種方案:
SELECT * FROM ARTICLE w1
WHERE ID in
(
SELECT top 30 ID FROM
(
SELECT top 45030 ID, YEAR FROM ARTICLE ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC
) w ORDER BY w.YEAR ASC, w.ID ASC

)
ORDER BY w1.YEAR DESC, w1.ID DESC

平均查詢100次所需時間:20S

第五種方案:
SELECT w2.n, w1.* FROM ARTICLE w1, (  SELECT TOP 50030 row_number() OVER (ORDER BY YEAR DESC, ID DESC) n, ID FROM ARTICLE ) w2 WHERE w1.ID = w2.ID AND w2.n > 50000 ORDER BY w2.n ASC

平均查詢100次所需時間:15S


在查詢頁數靠前時,效率3>4>5>2>1,頁碼靠後時5>4>3>1>2,再根據用戶習慣,一般用戶的檢索只看最前面幾頁,因此選擇3 4 5方案均可,若綜合考慮方案5是最好的選擇,但是要註意SQL2000不支持row_number()函數

總結分頁SQL:
1、 使用兩個select和兩個order,雙倒序:比如你有查找相關記錄中10001-10020的20條記錄。你先按照某字段排序,查找前10020條記錄,形成數據集,再進行倒序查找前20條。這種方法比較簡單,但進行多字段排序時,有時候會出現莫名奇妙的錯誤(可能我不夠經驗)。
2、 使用兩個select,並產生臨時序號:一樣比如你有查找相關記錄中10001-10020的20條記錄。你首先查找所有相關數據,並增加新的列儲存記錄臨時序號,形成數據集,再根據查找數據集,而條件增加了臨時序號在10001-10020之間。這種方法必須使用陌生的產生臨時序號函數,而產生臨時序號的函數只有SQL Serrver 2005 才支持。
3、 創建臨時表,產生臨時ID:一樣比如你有查找相關記錄中10001-10020的20條記錄。你可以首先創建一個只有自增ID和你需要查找相關記錄的自己字段的臨時表,並將你查找記錄的主鍵填入臨時表。再查詢臨時表,增加條件臨時序號在10001-10020之間。最後刪除臨時表。這種方法最復雜,但可擴展的空間比較大,性能的優化的潛力也應該比較強。
----------------兩個select 加兩個order,雙倒序(27秒鐘)
select top 20 * from (select top 349980 * from Test where type >5 order by type desc) as temp order by type desc
"select top”+numcount+” * from Jokes where id not in ( select top "+numcount*(當前頁-1)+" id from Jokes order by id desc ) order by id desc";

----------------兩個select 產生臨時序號(1秒鐘)
select * from (
select * ,ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY type,ID) AS RowRank from Test where type >5) as temp
where RowRank between 350001 and 350020
----------------臨時表,create+insert+select+drop(3秒鐘)
----------------臨時表,create+insert+select(2秒鐘)
CREATE TABLE #PageIndexForUsers
(
IndexID int IDENTITY (0, 1) NOT NULL,
ID int
)
INSERT INTO #PageIndexForUsers (ID)
SELECT ID
FROM Test
WHERE type >5
ORDER BY type,ID

SELECT T.* FROM Test T, #PageIndexForUsers p
WHERE p.ID = T.ID AND
p.IndexId between 350000 and 350019

drop table #PageIndexForUsers
運行結果占用了時間是第一種方式用了27秒,第二種用了1秒,第三種不加drop用了2秒,加drop用了3秒。

查詢 31到40條記錄 的各種玩法
1. 如果ID連續
select * from A where ID between 31 and 40
2. 如果ID不連續,提供三種寫法
--兩次對表A查詢效率較低
select top 10 * from A where ID not in (select top 30 ID from A)

--外層查詢沒有對表A查詢,效率大有提高
select top 10 * from (select top 40 * from A order by ID) as t order by t.ID desc

--ROW_NUMBER()函數效率更高,sqlserver2005以及以上版本中才可以使用
select * from (select ROW_NUMBER() over(order by ID) as ‘sequence‘,A.* from A ) as t where t.sequence between 31 and 40

--查詢16-20之間記錄
select * from (select ROW_NUMBER() over(order by ID) as ‘sequence‘,ent_pos.* from ent_pos ) as t where t.sequence between 16 and 20

select top 5 * from (select top 20 * from ent_pos order by ID) as t order by t.ID desc

select top 5 * from ent_pos where ID not in (select top 15 ID from ent_pos)

--如果是海量數據做查詢的話,這個是更高效的,這個不錯
select top 10 * from A where id in
(select top 10 id from (select top 40 id from A order by ID desc) as t order by t.ID )
order by A.ID desc
--這哥們給出了sql2012的新寫法,我機器上沒裝這麽前衛的工具,在我老大的機器上測試可行,性能效率暫不明確
SELECT * FROM A Order by ID OFFSET 30 ROWS FETCH NEXT 10 ROWS ONLY

高效的SQLSERVER分頁方案