高併發下System.currentTimeMillis()併發問題以及優化對比
阿新 • • 發佈:2018-12-11
前言
在高併發場景下System.currentTimeMillis()併發問題嚴重,甚至比建立一個普通物件要耗時的多;在系統中有時候不可避免要列印一些時間戳,但怎麼做才更好呢。
程式碼實現
iimport java.util.concurrent.Executors; import java.util.concurrent.ScheduledExecutorService; import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong; /** * 高併發場景下System.currentTimeMillis()的效能問題的優化 * 時間戳列印建議使用 */ public class SystemClock { private static final String THREAD_NAME = "system.clock"; private static final SystemClock MILLIS_CLOCK = new SystemClock(1); private final long precision; private final AtomicLong now; private SystemClock(long precision) { this.precision = precision; now = new AtomicLong(System.currentTimeMillis()); scheduleClockUpdating(); } public static SystemClock millisClock() { return MILLIS_CLOCK; } private void scheduleClockUpdating() { ScheduledExecutorService scheduler = Executors.newSingleThreadScheduledExecutor(runnable -> { Thread thread = new Thread(runnable, THREAD_NAME); thread.setDaemon(true); return thread; }); scheduler.scheduleAtFixedRate(() -> now.set(System.currentTimeMillis()), precision, precision, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS); } public long now() { return now.get(); } }
呼叫示例 Long start = SystemClock.millisClock().now()
測試對比
public static void main(String[] args) { int times=Integer.MAX_VALUE; long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { SystemClock.millisClock().now(); } long end = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("SystemClock Time:" + (end - start) + "毫秒"); long start2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); for (long i = 0; i < times; i++) { System.currentTimeMillis(); } long end2 = System.currentTimeMillis(); System.out.println("SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:" + (end2 - start2) + "毫秒"); }
輸出結果是: SystemClock Time:2741毫秒 SystemCurrentTimeMillis Time:14072毫秒 五倍的效率
細節決定成敗,敬畏每一行程式碼,程式碼優化永無止境!