本文編輯整理自：
http://sg552.iteye.com/blog/1300713 http://web.mit.edu/bitbucket/git-doc/git-cherry-pick.txt git cherry-pick 用於把另一個本地分支的commit修改應用到當前分支。 實際問題     在本地  master  分支上做了一個 commit  (  38361a68138140827b31b72f8bbfd88b3705d77a  ) ， 如何把它放到 本地 old_cc 分支上？  辦法之一： 使用  cherry-pick .  根據git 文件： Apply the changes introduced by some existing commits  就是對已經存在的commit 進行apply (可以理解為再次提交） 簡單用法： git cherry-pick <commit id> 例如： $ git checkout old_cc $  git   cherry-pick   38361a68 1. 如果順利，就會正常提交。結果： Finished one cherry-pick. # On branch old_cc # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/old_cc' by 3 commits. 2. 如果在cherry-pick 的過程中出現了衝突 Automatic cherry-pick failed.  After resolving the conflicts, mark the corrected paths with 'git add <paths>' or 'git rm <paths>' and commit the result with:            git commit -c 15a2b6c61927e5aed6718de89ad9dafba939a90b   就跟普通的衝突一樣，手工解決： 執行git status 看哪些檔案出現衝突 $ git status  both modified:      app/models/user.rb  接著手動解決衝突的檔案，然後通過git add把改到新增到索引，最後執行git commit提交修改就好了。 $ vim app/models/user.rb    $ git add app/models/user.rb git commit -c < 原commit號 > git-cherry-pick(1) ==================   NAME ---- git-cherry-pick - Apply the changes introduced by some existing commits   SYNOPSIS -------- 'git cherry-pick' [--edit] [-n] [-m parent-number] [-s] [-x] [--ff] <commit>...   DESCRIPTION -----------   Given one or more existing commits, apply the change each one introduces, recording a new commit for each.  This requires your working tree to be clean (no modifications from the HEAD commit).   When it is not obvious how to apply a change, the following happens:   1. The current branch and `HEAD` pointer stay at the last commit    successfully made. 2. The `CHERRY_PICK_HEAD` ref is set to point at the commit that    introduced the change that is difficult to apply. 3. Paths in which the change applied cleanly are updated both    in the index file and in your working tree. 4. For conflicting paths, the index file records up to three    versions, as described in the "TRUE MERGE" section of    linkgit:git-merge[1].  The working tree files will include    a description of the conflict bracketed by the usual    conflict markers `<<<<<<<` and `>>>>>>>`. 5. No other modifications are made.   See linkgit:git-merge[1] for some hints on resolving such conflicts.   OPTIONS ------- <commit>...:: Commits to cherry-pick. For a more complete list of ways to spell commits, see linkgit:gitrevisions[7]. Sets of commits can be passed but no traversal is done by default, as if the '--no-walk' option was specified, see linkgit:git-rev-list[1].   -e:: --edit:: With this option, 'git cherry-pick' will let you edit the commit message prior to committing.   -x:: When recording the commit, append to the original commit message a note that indicates which commit this change was cherry-picked from.  Append the note only for cherry picks without conflicts.  Do not use this option if you are cherry-picking from your private branch because the information is useless to the recipient.  If on the other hand you are cherry-picking between two publicly visible branches (e.g. backporting a fix to a maintenance branch for an older release from a development branch), adding this information can be useful.   -r:: It used to be that the command defaulted to do `-x` described above, and `-r` was to disable it.  Now the default is not to do `-x` so this option is a no-op.   -m parent-number:: --mainline parent-number:: Usually you cannot cherry-pick a merge because you do not know which side of the merge should be considered the mainline.  This option specifies the parent number (starting from 1) of the mainline and allows cherry-pick to replay the change relative to the specified parent.   -n:: --no-commit:: Usually the command automatically creates a sequence of commits. This flag applies the changes necessary to cherry-pick each named commit to your working tree and the index, without making any commit.  In addition, when this option is used, your index does not have to match the HEAD commit.  The cherry-pick is done against the beginning state of your index. + This is useful when cherry-picking more than one commits' effect to your index in a row.   -s:: --signoff:: Add Signed-off-by line at the end of the commit message.   --ff:: If the current HEAD is the same as the parent of the cherry-pick'ed commit, then a fast forward to this commit will be performed.   --strategy=<strategy>:: Use the given merge strategy.  Should only be used once. See the MERGE STRATEGIES section in linkgit:git-merge[1] for details.   -X<option>:: --strategy-option=<option>:: Pass the merge strategy-specific option through to the merge strategy.  See linkgit:git-merge[1] for details.   EXAMPLES -------- git cherry-pick master::   Apply the change introduced by the commit at the tip of the master branch and create a new commit with this change.   git cherry-pick ..master:: git cherry-pick ^HEAD master::   Apply the changes introduced by all commits that are ancestors of master but not of HEAD to produce new commits.   git cherry-pick master{tilde}4 master{tilde}2::   Apply the changes introduced by the fifth and third last commits pointed to by master and create 2 new commits with these changes.   git cherry-pick -n master~1 next::   Apply to the working tree and the index the changes introduced by the second last commit pointed to by master and by the last commit pointed to by next, but do not create any commit with these changes.   git cherry-pick --ff ..next::   If history is linear and HEAD is an ancestor of next, update the working tree and advance the HEAD pointer to match next. Otherwise, apply the changes introduced by those commits that are in next but not HEAD to the current branch, creating a new commit for each new change.   git rev-list --reverse master \-- README | git cherry-pick -n --stdin::   Apply the changes introduced by all commits on the master branch that touched README to the working tree and index, so the result can be inspected and made into a single new commit if suitable.   The following sequence attempts to backport a patch, bails out because the code the patch applies to has changed too much, and then tries again, this time exercising more care about matching up context lines.   ------------ $ git cherry-pick topic^             <1> $ git diff                           <2> $ git reset --merge ORIG_HEAD        <3> $ git cherry-pick -Xpatience topic^  <4> ------------ <1> apply the change that would be shown by `git show topic^`. In this example, the patch does not apply cleanly, so information about the conflict is written to the index and working tree and no new commit results. <2> summarize changes to be reconciled <3> cancel the cherry-pick.  In other words, return to the pre-cherry-pick state, preserving any local modifications you had in the working tree. <4> try to apply the change introduced by `topic^` again, spending extra time to avoid mistakes based on incorrectly matching context lines.          

再分享一下我老師大神的人工智慧教程吧。零基礎！通俗易懂！風趣幽默！希望你也加入到我們人工智慧的隊伍中來！http://www.captainbed.net