2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題第3篇 Snap decisions

阿新 • • 發佈：2017-07-18

ati 閱讀 uri app call 想要速度代理 dog

Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap over reactions, if we take a moment and think about how we are likely to react, we can reduce or even eliminate the negative effects of our quick, hard-wired responses.

科學家已經發現：雖然我們易於快速地做出過度反應，但是如果我們花點時間考慮一下我們可能做出的反應，就可以減少，甚至是消除我們快速、本能的反應所帶來的消極影響。

// you need have taken a moment and think about this opportunity over again. Snap decisions can be important defense mechanisms; if we are judging whether someone is dangerous, our brains and bodies are hard-wired to react very quickly, within milliseconds. But we need more time to assess other factors. To

accurately tell whether someone is sociable, studies show, we need at least a minute, preferably five. It takes a while to judge complex aspects of personality, like neuroticism oropen-mindedness. 快速決策可以是身體重要的防禦機制；如果我們是在判斷某人是否是個危險人物，我們的大腦和身體會自發地在幾毫秒鐘內做出快速反應。但是，若要評定其它因素，我們則需要更多的時間。研究表明：要準確地辨別某人是否是好交際的，我們至少需要一分鐘的時間，五分鐘會更好。想要評判復雜的性格方面，如或是神經過敏或是思想開闊等，就更要花上一段時間了。

// we need more time to think about how the terrorist broke into the house, why the housekeeper stopped it. // to accruately tell whether the interviewee have the professional skills, the employeers are tend to ask the employee to introudce his work experiences. Then he takes a while to jude this interviewer whether this man is worth recuriting. // To dager, we need at least 0.6s to response. But snap decisions in reaction to rapid stimuli aren‘t exclusive to the interpersonal realm. Psychologists at the University of Toronto found that viewing a fast-food logo for just a few milliseconds primes us to read 20 percent faster, even though reading has little to do witheating. We unconsciously associate fast food with speed and impatience and carry those impulses into whatever else we‘re doing. Subjects exposed to fast-food flashes also tend to think a musical piece lasts too long. 另外，以應對快速刺激而做出的快速決策並不專屬於人際範疇。多倫多大學的心理學家們曾發現：即便閱讀和吃東西沒什麽關系，用短短幾毫秒的時間看一家快餐店的標誌還是會刺激人們提高20％的閱讀速度。我們一想到快餐，就無意識地聯想起快速和急躁，並把這些一時產生的情緒帶到我們正在做的任何事情當中。接觸一閃而過快餐標誌的受試者們也往往會認為一段音樂持續時間的太長了。 // President at the university of Peking pointed that // people rarely took long time to think about what they have to choice, which made nonsensible decisions. Yet we can reverse such influences. If we know we will overreact to consumer products or housing options when we see a happy face (one reason good sales representatives and realestate agents are always smiling), we can take a moment before buying. If we know femalejob screeners are more likely to reject attractive female applicants, we can help screener sunderstand their biases-or hire outside screeners. 然而，我們可以完全改變這些影響。如果我們知道看見笑臉相迎會讓我在選擇消費產品或房屋時做出過度的反應(這是銷售代理和房產中介總是面帶笑容的一個很好的理由)，我們可以在購買之前等上一段時間。如果我們知道女性招聘官們更加有可能拒絕有魅力的女性求職者，我們就可以幫助招聘們認識到他們的偏見，亦或是雇傭獨立招聘官們。 John Gottman, the marriage expert, explains that we quickly "thin slice" information reliablyonly after we ground such snap reactions in "thick sliced" long-term study. When Dr. Gottmanreally wants to assess whether a couple will stay together, he invites them to his islandretreat for a much longer evaluation; two days, not two seconds. 婚姻專家約翰·戈特曼解釋說：我們的快速反應只有基於對"大塊"信息進行長期的研究之後，我們才能信賴我們快速汲取的"薄片"信息。在戈特曼非常想要評定兩個人將是否會共同生活，他會為了進行更長期的評價工作而邀請他們去他島上的修養之所呆上是兩天，而不是兩秒。 Our ability to mute our hard-wired reactions by pausing is what differentiates us from animals: dogs can think about the future only intermittently or for a few minutes. But historically wehave spent about 12 percent of our days contemplating the longer term. Although technologymight change the way we react, it hasn‘t changed our nature. We still have the imaginativecapacity to rise above temptation and reverse the high-speed trend. 我們具有通過暫停來減緩我們本能反應的能力，這使我們有別於動物: 狗智能斷斷續續地思考未來，思考時間只能持續幾分鐘。但是，從個人歷史的角度來看，我們每天花了12%的時間思索更長遠的事情。盡管科技可能了改變我們反應的方式，但科技還沒有改變我們的天性。我們仍然有富於想象的能力，讓我們不受誘惑的影響，並完全改變高速的發展趨勢。

2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題第3篇 Snap decisions

ati 閱讀 uri app call 想要速度代理 dog Scientists have found that although we are prone to snap over reactions, if we take a moment and think

2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題第3篇 Snap decisions

2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題第3篇 Snap decisions

2016年12月英語六級閱讀真題及答案第3套

2018年12月英語四級閱讀真題答案解析（空氣汙染）

2018年12月六級英語考試（卷二）真題解析

2017年軟體評測師上午真題 + 答案（二）

2001年3月英語中級口譯真題答案及聽力原文

2017年軟考各科最新真題詳細解析資料集錦

2018年上半年軟考各科真題及答案解析免費下載--軟考金牌講師徐朋

2017年軟體評測師上午真題 + 答案（一）

【LeetCode】Longest Palindromic Substring && 【九度】題目1528：最長迴文子串(騰訊2013年實習生招聘二面面試題)

PAT A 1151（甲級 2018年9月真題第四題）

ccf真題-201512-3-畫圖AC題解

第六屆藍橋杯軟體類省賽真題第七題：加法變乘法

ccf真題-201604-3-.路徑解析-題解

2017華為暑期實習生招聘真題（3月24日）

2015年藍橋杯省賽B組第3題--三羊獻瑞（暴力和深搜）

【資料結構與演算法】之二叉查詢樹 --- 第十三篇

程式碼整潔之道閱讀筆記_第3次

計算機基礎之牛客網刷題第五篇

Python 分析 35 年的考研英語真題詞彙，解讀孤獨的考研大軍！

2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題 第3篇 Snap decisions

相關推薦

2013年考研英語(二)閱讀真題第3篇 Snap decisions