meta分析文獻質量評價
阿新 • • 發佈：2019-01-09
1.橫斷面研究
最常用評價量表：AHQR量表（低：1-3；中等：4-7；高：8-11）
| Item | Yes | No | Unclear |
| 1) Define the source of information (survey, record review) | |||
| 2) List inclusion and exclusion criteria for exposed and unexposed subjects (cases and controls) or refer to previous publications | |||
| 3) Indicate time period used for identifying patients |
|||
| 4) Indicate whether or not subjects were consecutive if not population-based | |||
| 5) Indicate if evaluators of subjective components of study were masked to other aspects of the status of the participants | |||
| 6) Describe any assessments undertaken for quality assurance purposes (e.g., test/retest of primary outcome measurements) |
|||
| 7) Explain any patient exclusions from analysis | |||
| 8) Describe how confounding was assessed and/or controlled. | |||
| 9) If applicable, explain how missing data were handled in the analysis | |||
| 10) Summarize patient response rates and completeness of data collection |
|||
| 11) Clarify what follow-up, if any, was expected and the percentage of patients for which incomplete data or follow-up was obtained |
2.病例對照研究及佇列研究
指標簡化如下
| representiveness of the exposed cohort（1） | Selection of the non-exposed cohort（1） | Ascertainment of exposure（1） | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at satrt of study（1） | Compare ability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis（2） | Assessment of outcome（1） | Was followup long enough for outcomes to occur（1） | Adequacy of follow up of cohorts（1） |
滿分9分，得分大於7分即高質量文獻。