神經網路與深度學習學習筆記：實現單隱層的神經網路
阿新 • • 發佈：2019-01-03
本文為吳恩達課程的程式設計大作業，需要建立的模型如下圖所示：
依賴庫
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from testCases import * #程式碼見文末附錄
import sklearn
import sklearn.datasets
import sklearn.linear_model
from planar_utils import plot_decision_boundary, sigmoid, load_planar_dataset, load_extra_datasets #程式碼見文末附錄 安裝sklearn
pip install -U scikit-learn載入資料集
%matplotlib inline
np.random.seed(1) # set a seed so that the results are consistent
X, Y = load_planar_dataset()所採用的資料集分佈情況如下圖所示，其中藍色點為正例，紅色點為反例：
plt.scatter(X[0, :], X[1, :], c=Y, s=40, cmap=plt.cm.Spectral);
使用shape方法得到資料集的矩陣形狀與樣本數量m：
shape_X = X.shape
shape_Y = Y.shape
m = shape_X[1]線性迴歸
使用sklearn內建的函式檢查線性迴歸在此資料集上的表現：
# Train the logistic regression classifier
clf = sklearn.linear_model.LogisticRegressionCV();
clf.fit(X.T, Y.T);
# Plot the decision boundary for logistic regression
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: clf.predict(x), X, Y)
plt.title("Logistic Regression" 由於資料的分佈特徵，可以看到線性迴歸表現非常糟糕：
神經網路模型
構建一個神經網路的通常步驟為：
- 構建神經網路框架
- 初始化各引數
- 迭代優化
- 前向傳播
- 計算損失
- 反向傳播
- 更新引數
模型框架
建立一個具有單隱層(設為4個節點)的神經網路模型，對於給定的輸入X與標記Y，求得輸入層與輸出層的節點數：
def layer_sizes(X, Y):
n_x = X.shape[0] # size of input layer
n_h = 4
n_y = Y.shape[0] # size of output layer
return (n_x, n_h, n_y)初始化模型引數
按照前文推導的各引數矩陣形狀，對模型的引數矩陣進行初始化(不明白權重引數W為什麼在隨機化後要*0.01？)：
def initialize_parameters(n_x, n_h, n_y):
np.random.seed(2)
W1 = np.random.randn(n_h,n_x)*0.01
b1 = np.zeros((n_h,1))
W2 = np.random.randn(n_y,n_h)*0.01
b2 = np.zeros((n_y,1))
assert (W1.shape == (n_h, n_x))
assert (b1.shape == (n_h, 1))
assert (W2.shape == (n_y, n_h))
assert (b2.shape == (n_y, 1))
parameters = {"W1": W1,
"b1": b1,
"W2": W2,
"b2": b2}
return parameters前向傳播
在推導反向傳播過程時，容易發現
def forward_propagation(X, parameters):
# Retrieve each parameter from the dictionary "parameters"
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
# Implement Forward Propagation to calculate A2 (probabilities)
Z1 = np.dot(W1,X)+b1
A1 = np.tanh(Z1)
Z2 = np.dot(W2,A1)+b2
A2 = sigmoid(Z2)
assert(A2.shape == (1, X.shape[1]))
cache = {"Z1": Z1,
"A1": A1,
"Z2": Z2,
"A2": A2}
return A2, cache計算損失
def compute_cost(A2, Y, parameters):
m = Y.shape[1] # number of example
# Compute the cross-entropy cost
logprobs = np.multiply(np.log(A2),Y)+np.multiply(np.log(1-A2),1-Y)
cost = - np.sum(logprobs)/m
cost = np.squeeze(cost) # makes sure cost is the dimension we expect.
# E.g., turns [[17]] into 17
assert(isinstance(cost, float))
return cost反向傳播
def backward_propagation(parameters, cache, X, Y):
m = X.shape[1]
# First, retrieve W1 and W2 from the dictionary "parameters".
W1 = parameters["W1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
# Retrieve also A1 and A2 from dictionary "cache".
A1 = cache["A1"]
A2 = cache["A2"]
# Backward propagation: calculate dW1, db1, dW2, db2.
dZ2 = A2-Y
dW2 = np.dot(dZ2,A1.T)/m
db2 = np.sum(dZ2,axis=1,keepdims=True)/m
dZ1 = np.dot(W2.T,dZ2)*(1 - np.power(A1, 2)) #注意此處的元素相乘
dW1 = np.dot(dZ1,X.T)/m
db1 = np.sum(dZ1,axis=1,keepdims=True)/m
grads = {"dW1": dW1,
"db1": db1,
"dW2": dW2,
"db2": db2}
return grads梯度下降,更新引數
關於學習率的選擇，與前文一致，太慢會導致學習速度過慢，而太快會導致多次錯過最優解而導致學習曲線震盪。具體演示如下圖：
程式碼實現：
def update_parameters(parameters, grads, learning_rate = 1.2):
# Retrieve each parameter from the dictionary "parameters"
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
# Retrieve each gradient from the dictionary "grads"
dW1 = grads["dW1"]
db1 = grads["db1"]
dW2 = grads["dW2"]
db2 = grads["db2"]
# Update rule for each parameter
W1 -= learning_rate*dW1
b1 -= learning_rate*db1
W2 -= learning_rate*dW2
b2 -= learning_rate*db2
parameters = {"W1": W1,
"b1": b1,
"W2": W2,
"b2": b2}
return parameters整合模型
def nn_model(X, Y, n_h, num_iterations = 10000, print_cost=False):
np.random.seed(3)
n_x = layer_sizes(X, Y)[0]
n_y = layer_sizes(X, Y)[2]
# Initialize parameters, then retrieve W1, b1, W2, b2. Inputs: "n_x, n_h, n_y". Outputs = "W1, b1, W2, b2, parameters".
parameters = initialize_parameters(n_x,n_h,n_y)
W1 = parameters["W1"]
b1 = parameters["b1"]
W2 = parameters["W2"]
b2 = parameters["b2"]
for i in range(0, num_iterations):
A2, cache = forward_propagation(X,parameters)
cost = compute_cost(A2,Y,parameters)
grads = backward_propagation(parameters,cache,X,Y)
parameters = update_parameters(parameters,grads)
# Print the cost every 1000 iterations
if print_cost and i % 1000 == 0:
print ("Cost after iteration %i: %f" %(i, cost))
return parameters輸出預測值
def predict(parameters, X):
A2, cache = forward_propagation(X,parameters)
predictions = (A2 > 0.5) #A2矩陣中大於0.5的元素會被轉為True,否則轉為False
return predictions模型表現與評價
在訓練資料集上的表現與擬合情況
# Build a model with a n_h-dimensional hidden layer
parameters = nn_model(X, Y, n_h = 4, num_iterations = 10000, print_cost=True)
# Plot the decision boundary
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict(parameters, x.T), X, Y)
plt.title("Decision Boundary for hidden layer size " + str(4))
# Print accuracy
predictions = predict(parameters, X)
print ('Accuracy: %d' % float((np.dot(Y,predictions.T) + np.dot(1-Y,1-predictions.T))/float(Y.size)*100) + '%')擬合情況：
9000次迭代之後的代價值為：0.2186，預測準確度為：90%。
考察不同隱層數量對模型的影響
plt.figure(figsize=(16, 32))
hidden_layer_sizes = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20]
for i, n_h in enumerate(hidden_layer_sizes):
plt.subplot(5, 2, i+1)
plt.title('Hidden Layer of size %d' % n_h)
parameters = nn_model(X, Y, n_h, num_iterations = 5000)
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict(parameters, x.T), X, Y)
predictions = predict(parameters, X)
accuracy = float((np.dot(Y,predictions.T) + np.dot(1-Y,1-predictions.T))/float(Y.size)*100)
print ("Accuracy for {} hidden units: {} %".format(n_h, accuracy))輸出：
可以看到最初隨著隱層數量的增加，模型的擬合度也隨之提高；隨著模型的增大，模型出現了對資料集的過擬合現象。
在其他資料集上的表現
作業末附了另一組資料：
# Datasets
noisy_circles, noisy_moons, blobs, gaussian_quantiles, no_structure = load_extra_datasets()
datasets = {"noisy_circles": noisy_circles,
"noisy_moons": noisy_moons,
"blobs": blobs,
"gaussian_quantiles": gaussian_quantiles}
### START CODE HERE ### (choose your dataset)
dataset = "gaussian_quantiles"
### END CODE HERE ###
X, Y = datasets[dataset]
X, Y = X.T, Y.reshape(1, Y.shape[0])
# make blobs binary
if dataset == "blobs":
Y = Y%2
# Visualize the data
plt.scatter(X[0, :], X[1, :], c=Y, s=40, cmap=plt.cm.Spectral);
再次以不同的隱層數量來重新訓練模型，檢視效果：
plt.figure(figsize=(16, 32))
hidden_layer_sizes = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 20]
for i, n_h in enumerate(hidden_layer_sizes):
plt.subplot(5, 2, i+1)
plt.title('Hidden Layer of size %d' % n_h)
parameters = nn_model(X, Y, n_h, num_iterations = 5000)
plot_decision_boundary(lambda x: predict(parameters, x.T), X, Y)
predictions = predict(parameters, X)
accuracy = float((np.dot(Y,predictions.T) + np.dot(1-Y,1-predictions.T))/float(Y.size)*100)
print ("Accuracy for {} hidden units: {} %".format(n_h, accuracy))結果：
附錄
testCases.py
import numpy as np
def layer_sizes_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
X_assess = np.random.randn(5, 3)
Y_assess = np.random.randn(2, 3)
return X_assess, Y_assess
def initialize_parameters_test_case():
n_x, n_h, n_y = 2, 4, 1
return n_x, n_h, n_y
def forward_propagation_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
X_assess = np.random.randn(2, 3)
parameters = {'W1': np.array([[-0.00416758, -0.00056267],
[-0.02136196, 0.01640271],
[-0.01793436, -0.00841747],
[ 0.00502881, -0.01245288]]),
'W2': np.array([[-0.01057952, -0.00909008, 0.00551454, 0.02292208]]),
'b1': np.array([[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.]]),
'b2': np.array([[ 0.]])}
return X_assess, parameters
def compute_cost_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
Y_assess = np.random.randn(1, 3)
parameters = {'W1': np.array([[-0.00416758, -0.00056267],
[-0.02136196, 0.01640271],
[-0.01793436, -0.00841747],
[ 0.00502881, -0.01245288]]),
'W2': np.array([[-0.01057952, -0.00909008, 0.00551454, 0.02292208]]),
'b1': np.array([[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.]]),
'b2': np.array([[ 0.]])}
a2 = (np.array([[ 0.5002307 , 0.49985831, 0.50023963]]))
return a2, Y_assess, parameters
def backward_propagation_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
X_assess = np.random.randn(2, 3)
Y_assess = np.random.randn(1, 3)
parameters = {'W1': np.array([[-0.00416758, -0.00056267],
[-0.02136196, 0.01640271],
[-0.01793436, -0.00841747],
[ 0.00502881, -0.01245288]]),
'W2': np.array([[-0.01057952, -0.00909008, 0.00551454, 0.02292208]]),
'b1': np.array([[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.],
[ 0.]]),
'b2': np.array([[ 0.]])}
cache = {'A1': np.array([[-0.00616578, 0.0020626 , 0.00349619],
[-0.05225116, 0.02725659, -0.02646251],
[-0.02009721, 0.0036869 , 0.02883756],
[ 0.02152675, -0.01385234, 0.02599885]]),
'A2': np.array([[ 0.5002307 , 0.49985831, 0.50023963]]),
'Z1': np.array([[-0.00616586, 0.0020626 , 0.0034962 ],
[-0.05229879, 0.02726335, -0.02646869],
[-0.02009991, 0.00368692, 0.02884556],
[ 0.02153007, -0.01385322, 0.02600471]]),
'Z2': np.array([[ 0.00092281, -0.00056678, 0.00095853]])}
return parameters, cache, X_assess, Y_assess
def update_parameters_test_case():
parameters = {'W1': np.array([[-0.00615039, 0.0169021 ],
[-0.02311792, 0.03137121],
[-0.0169217 , -0.01752545],
[ 0.00935436, -0.05018221]]),
'W2': np.array([[-0.0104319 , -0.04019007, 0.01607211, 0.04440255]]),
'b1': np.array([[ -8.97523455e-07],
[ 8.15562092e-06],
[ 6.04810633e-07],
[ -2.54560700e-06]]),
'b2': np.array([[ 9.14954378e-05]])}
grads = {'dW1': np.array([[ 0.00023322, -0.00205423],
[ 0.00082222, -0.00700776],
[-0.00031831, 0.0028636 ],
[-0.00092857, 0.00809933]]),
'dW2': np.array([[ -1.75740039e-05, 3.70231337e-03, -1.25683095e-03,
-2.55715317e-03]]),
'db1': np.array([[ 1.05570087e-07],
[ -3.81814487e-06],
[ -1.90155145e-07],
[ 5.46467802e-07]]),
'db2': np.array([[ -1.08923140e-05]])}
return parameters, grads
def nn_model_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
X_assess = np.random.randn(2, 3)
Y_assess = np.random.randn(1, 3)
return X_assess, Y_assess
def predict_test_case():
np.random.seed(1)
X_assess = np.random.randn(2, 3)
parameters = {'W1': np.array([[-0.00615039, 0.0169021 ],
[-0.02311792, 0.03137121],
[-0.0169217 , -0.01752545],
[ 0.00935436, -0.05018221]]),
'W2': np.array([[-0.0104319 , -0.04019007, 0.01607211, 0.04440255]]),
'b1': np.array([[ -8.97523455e-07],
[ 8.15562092e-06],
[ 6.04810633e-07],
[ -2.54560700e-06]]),
'b2': np.array([[ 9.14954378e-05]])}
return parameters, X_assessplanar_utils.py
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
import sklearn
import sklearn.datasets
import sklearn.linear_model
def plot_decision_boundary(model, X, y):
# Set min and max values and give it some padding
x_min, x_max = X[0, :].min() - 1, X[0, :].max() + 1
y_min, y_max = X[1, :].min() - 1, X[1, :].max() + 1
h = 0.01
# Generate a grid of points with distance h between them
xx, yy = np.meshgrid(np.arange(x_min, x_max, h), np.arange(y_min, y_max, h))
# Predict the function value for the whole grid
Z = model(np.c_[xx.ravel(), yy.ravel()])
Z = Z.reshape(xx.shape)
# Plot the contour and training examples
plt.contourf(xx, yy, Z, cmap=plt.cm.Spectral)
plt.ylabel('x2')
plt.xlabel('x1')
plt.scatter(X[0, :], X[1, :], c=y, cmap=plt.cm.Spectral)
def sigmoid(x):
s = 1/(1+np.exp(-x))
return s
def load_planar_dataset():
np.random.seed(1)
m = 400 # number of examples
N = int(m/2) # number of points per class
D = 2 # dimensionality
X = np.zeros((m,D)) # data matrix where each row is a single example
Y = np.zeros((m,1), dtype='uint8') # labels vector (0 for red, 1 for blue)
a = 4 # maximum ray of the flower
for j in range(2):
ix = range(N*j,N*(j+1))
t = np.linspace(j*3.12,(j+1)*3.12,N) + np.random.randn(N)*0.2 # theta
r = a*np.sin(4*t) + np.random.randn(N)*0.2 # radius
X[ix] = np.c_[r*np.sin(t), r*np.cos(t)]
Y[ix] = j
X = X.T
Y = Y.T
return X, Y
def load_extra_datasets():
N = 200
noisy_circles = sklearn.datasets.make_circles(n_samples=N, factor=.5, noise=.3)
noisy_moons = sklearn.datasets.make_moons(n_samples=N, noise=.2)
blobs = sklearn.datasets.make_blobs(n_samples=N, random_state=5, n_features=2, centers=6)
gaussian_quantiles = sklearn.datasets.make_gaussian_quantiles(mean=None, cov=0.5, n_samples=N, n_features=2, n_classes=2, shuffle=True, random_state=None)
no_structure = np.random.rand(N, 2), np.random.rand(N, 2)
return noisy_circles, noisy_moons, blobs, gaussian_quantiles, no_structure